Hi,
i've tried to draw traffic-graphs for TenGigabit and Gigabit Interfaces on a Cisco 6500 (Sup720).
While Cacti draws a Graph for a Gigabit-Interface with a Max of 500Mbit Oreon draws a Graph for the same Interface with a Max of 65Mbit. Both had the same timerange. Is it possible that Oreon can't handle the full throughput on Gigabit or TenGigabit Interfaces?
I've tried to change the SNMP-Variable for the Interfaces in Oreon.conf from the standard-counters (32bit) to the snmpv2-hispeed-counters (64bit). With the standard-counters the throughput wasn't near 1mbit when Cacti drawed about 500Mbit.
Yes the interface really has that throughput. It is the Uplink to our Primary Router...
The max peaks occur in both graphs at right time but didn't match the max-value of each other.
I also checked the stepping of rrd. The created service for check_graph_traffic.pl is configured with a check-interval of 5 Minutes. The .rrd file had a step of 300 Seconds.
I've installed Oreon 1-3-1
Regards,
Fantasio
i've tried to draw traffic-graphs for TenGigabit and Gigabit Interfaces on a Cisco 6500 (Sup720).
While Cacti draws a Graph for a Gigabit-Interface with a Max of 500Mbit Oreon draws a Graph for the same Interface with a Max of 65Mbit. Both had the same timerange. Is it possible that Oreon can't handle the full throughput on Gigabit or TenGigabit Interfaces?
I've tried to change the SNMP-Variable for the Interfaces in Oreon.conf from the standard-counters (32bit) to the snmpv2-hispeed-counters (64bit). With the standard-counters the throughput wasn't near 1mbit when Cacti drawed about 500Mbit.
Yes the interface really has that throughput. It is the Uplink to our Primary Router...
The max peaks occur in both graphs at right time but didn't match the max-value of each other.
I also checked the stepping of rrd. The created service for check_graph_traffic.pl is configured with a check-interval of 5 Minutes. The .rrd file had a step of 300 Seconds.
I've installed Oreon 1-3-1
Regards,
Fantasio
Comment